What is the primary difference between AI and CAS in terms of integration?

The primary distinction between Air Interdiction (AI) and Close Air Support (CAS) in terms of integration lies in the level of detail involved in their planning and execution. AI typically focuses on targeting enemy forces and supply lines that are located away from friendly ground forces. In this context, it operates at a higher operational level and often does not require the same level of real-time coordination with ground troops. This allows for a more generalized approach to target selection and engagement, leading to less detailed integration with ground operations.

In contrast, CAS is specifically designed to support ground forces directly, requiring significant coordination and real-time communication to ensure that air strikes do not inadvertently impact friendly troops. This level of integration is essential because of the proximity to ground forces and the need for precise targeting to avoid collateral damage.

Therefore, stating that AI involves less detailed integration accurately captures its less immediate connection with ground operations compared to the comprehensive integration required for effective CAS.